EU and VS will protect civilian-data more equally thanks to new agreement.

The European Commission and the US promise that personal data that is interchanged for enforcement purposes, will be better protected. 

Robust cooperation between the EU and the US to fight crime and terrorism is crucial to keep Europeans safe. But all exchanges of personal data, such as criminal records, names or addresses, needs to be governed by strong data protection rules. This is what the “Umbrella Agreement”, as named by the European Commission, will ensure.

Once in force, this agreement will guarantee a high level of protection of all personal data when transferred between law enforcement authorities across the Atlantic. It will in particular guarantee that all EU citizens have the right to enforce their data protection rights in US courts – as called for in the political guidelines of President Juncker last year.

Under certain conditions, civilians get the right to view their personal data that is exchanged, although it is unclear what these conditions exactly are. In addition, the EU and US promise to not use the exchanged data for other purposes than criminal enforcement and they will not store the data for longer than is needed. This retention period has to be announced publically by the authorities. The exchange of data to other 3rd parties is prohibited unless permission is granted by the country of origin where the data came from.

However, the agreement will only go in force when the US signs the Judicial Redress Bill. This bill is part of the negotiations initiated by Washington to regain the thrust of Europe in the US, after it got damaged by the revelations by Snowden of the NSA eavesdropping on Europeans and especially European politicians. But not only civilians, also businesses are getting spied on in order to gain their secrets.

–I think we already passed the stage where we should trust the European Commission -or other instances that fight this issue trough political ways-, to protect our freedom, rights and privacy. Even though they act out of good faith, it isn’t helping. It’s a lost cause, as long as government- and intelligence agencies like the NSA (and the Dutch AIVD) have the technical capabilities to infringe our privacy and limit our freedoms, they will continue to do so one way or another.

If you don’t want to be spied or monitored on by these agencies or other parties, there is only one solution: 100% encryption on everything you do. Every communication, website views, payments, contacts and so on, do everything with end-to-end encryption. You have to take measures on your own and don’t let your security and privacy dependent on the seemingly good will of other, third parties. Not only civilians but also businesses should take these measures to avoid industrial espionage. Of course, the other side of this discussion is public safety, for as spying could also reveal possible terrorists and other threats.. What would you prefer?

Author: Hidde van Heijst
S.I.D: 436800


About Hidde - 436800


2 responses to “EU and VS will protect civilian-data more equally thanks to new agreement.”

  1. Wouterb says :

    Personal privacy vs. Public safety, an interesting and heavily debated subject. First of all, I do agree with you that having instances protecting individuals’ personal privacy through political and legal ways is of course very important but not enough. Intelligence agencies have the technological means (and habit) to protect public safety by infringing individuals’ personal privacies.

    Your discussion goes an interesting direction with the statement that the only solution will be 100% encryption. I am curious how you see this. I think (most) individuals and businesses do not have the technical knowledge or means to encrypt every communication at the extent that intelligence agencies cannot use it, not now nor anytime soon. You argued that even politicians – who use encryption technologies – are known to be spied upon. Will intelligence agencies or parties with bad intentions not just develop stronger tools?

    Great article and interesting perspective by the way!

    Wouter Bakker, 357176wb

    • Hidde says :

      Hi Wouter,

      You have some good points that I also considered. However good end-to-end encryption is very, -very- hard to crack. For every message sent, intelligence agencies would probably spend hours decrypting the message.
      A good metaphor for this: A professional burglar can break into any house, but should you make it easy for him knowing that?

      Anyways, some examples how individuals, and businesses, can safeguard their information: use SpiderOak instead of Dropbox, Telegram instead of Whatsapp and DuckDuckGo instead of Google. It’s not hard to find these applications if you know what to search for. Now I don’t use these examples myself, but it would be wise (if you have anything to hide)..

      Cheers! Hidde

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: